Archaeology has gone interstellar.
The peculiar behavior of KIC 8462852—a star 1,500 light-years from Earth that is prone to irregular dimming—has prompted widespread speculation on the Internet that it is host to an “alien megastructure,” perhaps a vast array of orbiting solar panels.
Scientists have pointed out various natural, non-alien phenomena that could be causing the stellar light show, but the SETI crowd isn’t taking any chances. Astronomers have begun using a radio telescope, the Allen Telescope Array, to detect possible signals in the vicinity of KIC 8462852.
But, the astronomers might be eavesdropping on a tomb.
For years, SETI researchers have argued that we can narrow our search for alien intelligence by looking for telltale signs of large, sophisticated structures built by advanced civilizations. They call this “cosmic archaeology.”
Yet, even if we were to find such artifacts, there’s no guarantee that the civilizations that created them are still around. Floating in space, abandoned for millennia, these objects could be the interstellar equivalent of the statues at Easter Island or the Egyptian Pyramids.
In fact, we might confront the morbid scenario that intelligent life periodically emerges on other worlds, but has an unfortunate tendency to self-destruct.
Sadly, it’s not implausible, given the devastation we’ve wrought during our relatively brief span as the dominant species on this planet.
That’s why a trio of scientists recently published a guide to help astronomers detect alien apocalypses—whether it’s the chemical signature of a world filled with rotting corpses, the radioactive aftermath of nuclear warfare, or the debris left over from a Death Star scenario where an entire planet gets blown to bits.
Call it SEETI, the Search for Extinct Extraterrestrial Intelligence.
Ironically, the idea of searching for ruined civilizations began at an academic workshop on “Building Habitable Worlds.”
“One of the concepts that we came up with was detecting the presence of life by detecting its own destruction,” says Jack O’Malley-James, an astrobiologist at Cornell University and one of the authors of the paper. “On top of telling us that there’s life out there, it also would give us a clue as to how common or rare we are as a civilization—and how long we could expect our civilization’s lifetime to be.”
The SEETI study builds upon techniques being developed for the next generation of telescopes to detect extraterrestrial biosignatures that would indicate the possible existence of alien life.
For instance, when looking at an exoplanet, oxygen in its atmosphere that is continuously replenished may suggest the presence of photosynthetic organisms.
SEETI research, however, is not looking for biosignatures—signs of life. Instead, scientists have to hunt down necrosignatures—signs of death—that would indicate destruction on a colossal scale.
Consider a scenario in which biological warfare rapidly wiped out a planet’s population. Microorganisms that cause decomposition would gorge themselves on alien corpses. In doing so, they would excrete chemical compounds, dramatically increasing the levels of methane and ethane in the atmosphere.
If the population size of the alien world were comparable to that of Earth, the methane and ethane gases would dissipate in about a year, so there would be only a short window of opportunity to detect the cataclysm.
However, if the biological arsenal included a genetically modified virus capable of jumping species, then the planet’s casualties might also include its animal life. In that case, the telltale signs of catastrophic biowarfare could be visible for several years.
An Unhealthy Glow
One clue that a civilization nuked itself into oblivion would be a change in the planet’s airglow. You’ve probably seen this phenomenon in dark night skies. High-speed electrons and protons, carried by the solar wind, smack into oxygen atoms in the atmosphere, causing them to produce a faint green light. Particles emitted by nuclear weapons would have a similar effect, generating “an order of magnitude increase in airglow brightness,” says the SEETI study.
An atmosphere’s chemistry would also be altered by the thermal effects of a global nuclear war. When a nuclear weapon explodes, the surrounding air reaches extremely high temperatures and then cools down relatively quickly. This results in a chemical reaction that produces tons of nitric oxide, which depletes the concentration of the ozone layer in the atmosphere.
These atmospheric changes would be observable for several years after the catastrophe, but their visibility would be impaired by yet another consequence of nuclear war: the significant amount of dust that would be lofted into the atmosphere.
Although unlikely, it’s possible that astronomers could see the “before-and-after” evidence of a nuclear war, if they observed a planet’s transparent atmosphere that later become opaque.
Of course, the atmospheric dust also could also be explained by natural causes. Instead of nuclear weapons, a large asteroid might have collided with the planet—although, granted, that distinction would matter little to anyone who was living there at the time.